Rinnai is increasingly involved with commercial heat pump projects that reduce a building's carbon footprint, satisfy future legislation and certify corporations environmental initiatives. However, like with any technology, commercial air source heat pumps (ASHP) come with their own challenges that are often misunderstood.
From capital and installation costs to performance requirements. Understanding these obstacles will help you make an informed choice about whether an air source heat pump is the right fit for your commercial retrofit project.
Disadvantage 1: Higher Initial Installation Costs
The upfront expense of purchasing and installing an ASHP system can be quite substantial, often ranging from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of pounds, depending on the system’s size and complexity. Economic feasibility studies are advised at the start of any retrofit project, to ensure the full costs of installation, capital goods and remedial works is fully known.
The installation process itself can also be complex and labour-intensive, requiring the expertise of qualified professionals. There may be other associated costs, such as upgrading electrical systems to accommodate the new heat pump(s), pipework renewal or making structural modifications to the building envelope to cater for the heat pump(s) and the additional storage needs. These added expenses can further increase the total cost of installation.
Disadvantage 2: Noise Levels and Operational Sound
The noise generated by air source heat pumps is another potential disadvantage. While modern ASHPs are designed to be quieter than older models, they can still produce noise during operation. This noise typically comes from the outdoor unit, which houses the compressor and fan. The sound of these components running can be a source of disturbance, particularly if the unit is located in noise restricted areas and also if multiple heat pumps are installed together.
Soundproofing is available on most heat pumps, however pay attention to how this can affect the overall performance of the system.
Disadvantage 3: Space Requirements
ASHPs are generally far larger in physical size and weight than a current gas appliance equivalent. The outdoor unit of an ASHP needs to be placed in a well-ventilated area with sufficient clearance around it to ensure optimal performance. This can be challenging in a retrofit environment, where the building likely has a purpose built plant room. Therefore, additional locations need to be sought. For instance a roof or protected outdoor space.
In addition to the space needed for the outdoor unit(s), the additional components of the system, such as the heat pump cylinders and storage buffer vessels also require adequate space within a building. This can be a concern for commercial buildings with limited interior space, where fitting the necessary equipment may require significant modifications. The need for additional space can complicate the installation process and increase the overall cost.
Disadvantage 4: Limited Heating Capacity
Finally, the limited heating capacity of air source heat pumps can be a significant drawback when compared to traditional heating systems, particularly for larger buildings or those with higher water heating demands. While ASHPs are capable of providing adequate heating for many applications, they may struggle to maintain comfortable temperatures in larger spaces or during periods of extreme cold weather without the use of excessive storage vessels and/or auxiliary heating backup.
This can add to the overall complexity and cost of a heating system and may negate some of the energy savings associated with using an ASHP. The need for supplemental heating can also increase the system’s reliance on backup power sources, which may not be as energy-efficient or environmentally friendly.
Additionally, the performance of an ASHP can be impacted by factors such as the building's insulation, window quality, and overall energy efficiency. Retrofit heating projects that are poorly insulated or have significant heat loss may find that an ASHP alone is not sufficient to maintain comfortable indoor temperatures or DHW demand.
Heat pump efficiency is also reduced in colder temperatures and climates. In colder climates, a heat pump can extract less heat from the cold outdoor air. The efficiency of a heat pump at low temperatures depends on the capability of the outdoor unit. However it means that the heat pump will have to work harder and use more energy which will result in higher operating costs.
Rinnai expert design engineers can support the design process with capital expenditure, operation expenditure and carbon modelling. Helping address the practical, economical and technical feasibility challenges faced by consultants and designers. To benefit from the Rinnai design service, contact us today for your free consultation.
Conclusion: Weighing the Pros and Cons of Air Source Heat Pumps
In conclusion, while air source heat pumps offer many benefits, including energy efficiency and environmental sustainability, they also come with a set of disadvantages. From reduced efficiency in extremely cold weather and higher initial installation costs to noise levels, space requirements, regular maintenance needs, potential for reduced lifespan, and limited heating capacity, these factors can impact the overall feasibility and cost-effectiveness of an ASHP system.
Consultants and specifiers should take the time to thoroughly research and evaluate whether an air source heat pump is the right fit for their specific needs and circumstances.
Ultimately, the choice to invest in an air source heat pump system should be made with a clear understanding of both its advantages and its potential drawbacks. By considering all aspects of this technology, homeowners and businesses can ensure that they make a decision that will provide reliable, efficient, and cost-effective heating for years to come.
To stay up to speed with energy policy, renewables products and design best practice. Don’t get left behind and join our free newsletter today.
